MIDWEST FEEDERS, INC. v. THE BANK OF FRANKLIN

Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-78-DCB-MTP.

MIDWEST FEEDERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE BANK OF FRANKLIN, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Western Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Negotiable Instrument
Nature of Suit: 140 Negotiable Instrument
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Midwest Feeders, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by John O'Brien , SNELL & WILMER, LLP, pro hac vice.

Midwest Feeders, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Neal McConomy , SNELL & WILMER, LLP, pro hac vice, Scott C. Sandberg , SNELL & WILMER, LLP, pro hac vice, Timothy G. O'Neill , SNELL & WILMER, LLP, pro hac vice & James Franklin Noble, III , NOBLE & NOBLE, PLLC.

The Bank of Franklin, Defendant, represented by Lawrence M. Quinlivan , DEUTSCH KERRIGAN, LLP, John L. Maxey, II , MAXEY WANN, PLLC, Judy L. Burnthorn , DEUTSCH KERRIGAN, LLP, Kelly H. Stringer , MAXEY WANN, PLLC, Lane B. Reed , MCGEHEE, MCGEHEE & TORREY, Mary Kathryn Williamson , MCGEHEE, MCGEHEE & TORREY, Matthew T. Biggers , DEUTSCH KERRIGAN, LLP & Steven Mark Wann , MAXEY WANN, PLLC.


ORDER

DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on defendant Bank of Franklin's Motion to File Bank of Franklin's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Related Nontaxable Expenses and Memorandum in Support under Seal (docket entry 400). Having carefully considered the motion and applicable law, and being fully informed in the premises, the Court finds that, for the reasons stated therein, the motion should be granted.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Seal (docket entry 400) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall place the Bank of Franklin's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Related Nontaxable Expenses (docket entry 396), together with Exhibits, and Memorandum in Support (docket entry 397) under seal. The motion, exhibits, and memorandum in support filed by Bank of Franklin shall not be unsealed until further Order of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases