ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
BRIAN MORRIS, District Judge.
The Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff Jory Strizich to file an initial disclosure statement as required by Paragraph I(A) of the Court's Scheduling Order within 30 days. (Doc. 26.) Mr. Strizich has failed to comply with the Court's Order. (Doc. 27 at 1.) United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on January 20, 2017. (Doc. 27.) Neither party filed objections.
When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
Judge Johnston recommended that the Court dismiss Mr. Strizich's case because he failed to comply with the Court's Order. (Doc. 27 at 4.) The Court specifically advised Mr. Strizich that failure to comply with the Court's Order would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed (Doc. 27 at 1.) Judge Johnston referenced the public interest, the Court's interest in managing its docket, risk of prejudice to the Defendants, the availability of less drastic alternatives, and public policy in determining that dismissal proves to be the correct path forward. These factors comprise the legal standard for determining when dismissal should be imposed as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing Ferdick, 963 F.2d at 1260-61).
The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations for clear error. The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in full.