KIRK v. SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC.

No. 3:13-cv-5032-DGK.

JODELLE L. KIRK, Plaintiff, v. SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC., and FAG BEARINGS, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Southwestern Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - (Citizenship)
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jodelle L. Kirk, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew K. Smith , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC.

Jodelle L. Kirk, Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan M. Soper , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC, Kenneth B. McClain , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC, Michael S. Kilgore , Humphrey, Farrington & McClain, PC, Colin W. McClain , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC, Kevin Daniel Stanley , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC, Lauren Elise McClain , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC, Scott A. Britton-Mehlisch , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC & Timothy J. Kingsbury , Humphrey, Farrington, & McClain, PC.

Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., Defendant, represented by Gary M. Roberts , pro hac vice, Gregory Thomas Wolf , Dentons US LLP, Jacqueline M. Whipple , Dentons US LLP, Kate Elizabeth Hart , Dentons US LLP, Richard D. Salgado , pro hac vice & Wade P.K. Carr , Dentons US LLP.

FAG Holding, LLC, Defendant, represented by Gary M. Roberts , pro hac vice, Gregory Thomas Wolf , Dentons US LLP, Jacqueline M. Whipple , Dentons US LLP, Kate Elizabeth Hart , Dentons US LLP, Richard D. Salgado , pro hac vice & Wade P.K. Carr , Dentons US LLP.

FAG Bearings, LLC, Defendant, represented by Gary M. Roberts , pro hac vice, Gregory Thomas Wolf , Dentons US LLP, Jacqueline M. Whipple , Dentons US LLP, Kate Elizabeth Hart , Dentons US LLP, Richard D. Salgado , pro hac vice & Wade P.K. Carr , Dentons US LLP.

Ashley E Norman, interested party, represented by Ashley Elizabeth Norman , Hershewe Law Firm.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT AND APPROVE AMOUNT OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND

GREG KAYS, Chief District Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment and Approve Amount of Supersedeas Bond (Doc. 591).

Defendants request the Court enter an order staying the execution of judgment and approve a supersedeas bond to be posted by Defendants in the amount of $22,500,000, an amount which will cover approximately the full amount of damages, costs, prejudgment interest, and postjudgment interest through March 2017. Defendants state they will file such a bond within ten business days of the Court's order setting the amount.

The motion is GRANTED. The Court stays execution of the judgment in this matter until February 17, 2017, and approves a supersedeas bond in the amount of $22,500,000 to be posted by Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases