1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KNUDSEN v. SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY LP
 

KNUDSEN v. SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY LP

Case No. CV 13-04476 (CRB).

RICHARD KNUDSEN, an individual, Qui Tam Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and United States of America and its Federal Agencies, a public entity, Plaintiffs, v. SPRINT COMMUNICATION COMPANY LP, SPRINT NEXTEL, SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SPRINT SPECTRUM LP, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS INCORPORATED, NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MID ATLANTIC INCORPORATED and Does 1-100, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

July 31, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colin H. Murray , Brian K. Tomkiel , BAKER & McKENZIE LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P.

Christopher B. Dolan , Aimee E. Kirby , Sandra I. Tan , THE DOLAN LAW FIRM, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Knudsen.

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME AND SET FURTHER BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SPRINT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

RECITALS

1. On June 5, 2015, the Court held a hearing on the Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by the Sprint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases