1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SANGER v. BOWIE RESOURCES, LLC
 

SANGER v. BOWIE RESOURCES, LLC

No. 3:14-CV-00541-PLR-CCS.

HERBER S. SANGER, JR. and WAGNER, MEYERS, & SANGER, P.C., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. BOWIE RESOURCES, LLC, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville Division.

June 29, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Plaintiff, represented by John A Lucas , Wagner, Myers & Sanger, PC.

Wagner, Myers & Sanger P.C., Plaintiff, represented by John A Lucas , Wagner, Myers & Sanger, PC.

Bowie Resources, LLC, Defendant, represented by Benjamin C Fultz , Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Matthew Cory Williams , Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Ryan M Connor , Paine, Tarwater, Bickers, LLP & Thomas A Bickers , Paine, Tarwater, Bickers, LLP.

Bowie Resources, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Benjamin C Fultz , Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Matthew Cory Williams , Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Ryan M Connor , Paine, Tarwater, Bickers, LLP & Thomas A Bickers , Paine, Tarwater, Bickers, LLP.

Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Counter Defendant, represented by Darryl G Lowe , Lowe, Yeager and Brown & John A Lucas , Wagner, Myers & Sanger, PC.

Wagner, Myers & Sanger P.C., Counter Defendant, represented by Darryl G Lowe , Lowe, Yeager and Brown & John A Lucas , Wagner, Myers & Sanger, PC.

Bowie Resources, LLC, Counter Claimant, represented by Benjamin C Fultz , Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Matthew Cory Williams , Fultz Maddox Hovious & Dickens, PLC, Ryan M Connor , Paine, Tarwater, Bickers, LLP & Thomas A Bickers , Paine, Tarwater, Bickers, LLP.

Herbert S. Sanger, Jr., Counter Defendant, represented by John A Lucas , Wagner, Myers & Sanger, PC.

Wagner, Myers & Sanger P.C., Counter Defendant, represented by John A Lucas , Wagner, Myers & Sanger, PC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss and two motions to strike portions of the counter-complaint. [R. 16]. In their first motion, the plaintiffs allege a jurisdictional defect in the counterclaim. They also allege that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases