LUXUL TECHNOLOGY INC. v. NECTARLUX, LLC

Case No. 14-CV-03656-LHK.

78 F.Supp.3d 1156 (2015)

LUXUL TECHNOLOGY INC., Plaintiff, v. NECTARLUX, LLC, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

Signed January 26, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melinda Mae Morton , Megan Elizabeth McCarthy , Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, Menlo Park, CA, James Thomas Erickson , John Louis Mlnarik , The Mlnarik Law Group, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, for Plaintiff.

Todd Michael Schneider , Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP, Kyle Geoffrey Bates , Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky Wotkyns LLP, San Francisco, CA, Michael C. McKay , Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky Wotkyns LLP, Scottsdale, AZ, for Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 21

Plaintiff Luxul Technology Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "Luxul") brings this action against Defendants Nectarlux, LLC, JKeeney Consulting, Inc., and James Keeney (collectively, "Defendants"). Before the Court is Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases