1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CONTINO v. FRONTIER ADJUSTERS, INC.
 

CONTINO v. FRONTIER ADJUSTERS, INC.

Docket No. 3:14-CV-00550-FDW-DSC.

JAYSON CONTINO, ET AL. Plaintiffs, v. FRONTIER ADJUSTERS, INC. ET AL., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division.

November 6, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jayson Contino, Plaintiff, represented by Derek Paul Adler , DeVore, Acton & Stafford, PA, Derek J. Famulari , Marks & Klein & Louis D. Tambaro , Marks & Klein.

Mamye Contino, Plaintiff, represented by Derek Paul Adler , DeVore, Acton & Stafford, PA, Derek J. Famulari , Marks & Klein & Louis D. Tambaro , Marks & Klein.

Frontier Adjusters, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Frontier Adjusters of Arizona, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Frontier Adjusters of America, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Merrymeeting, Inc., Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

John M Davies, Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Edward Ferrie, Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Patrick Enthoven, Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Jeffrey Harcourt, Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Milo Bolender, Defendant, represented by Andrew Joseph Poltorak , Ulmer & Berne & Stephen Allan Markus , Ulmer & Berne LLP.

ORDER

FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration and Request for Preliminary Hearing (Doc. No. 18) and Defendants' Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference (Doc. No. 34). Having carefully considered the record in the above-referenced case, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. No. 18) and DENIES Defendants' Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases