1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MASON v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARK
 

MASON v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARK

Case No. C13-0676-JCC.

MICHELE MASON, et al., Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST PARK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

August 18, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michele Mason, Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence A Hildes .

Michael Gilmore, Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence A Hildes .

All Plaintiffs, Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence A Hildes .

The City of Lake Forest Park, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Tony Matthews, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Steven Parken, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Jack Beard, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

James Craswell, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Rhonda Lehman, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Garry Jackson, Defendant, represented by Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Amy Troxell, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

Dennis Peterson, Defendant, represented by Danielle M. Evans , KENYON DISEND, Ann Marie Josephine Soto , KENYON DISEND & Jeremy W Culumber , KEATING BUCKLIN & MCCORMACK.

ORDER

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' joint motion to continue the trial date in this matter (Dkt. No. 32), the response of Plaintiffs' counsel to this Court's August 7, 2014 Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 33), and Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 34). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court GRANTS the motion for a continuance; DISMISSES Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases