DOUGLAS BOGGS, MICHELLE A. MOQUIN, Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK NA, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, WORLD SAVINGS, GOLDEN W SAV. ASSOC. SERVICES CO., NDEX WEST LLC, LSI Title Co., and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 14, 2012.
June 14, 2012.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Douglas J. Boggs, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Michelle A. Moquin, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Defendant, represented by Frederick James Hickman , Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten LLP, Grace B Kang , Anglin, Flewelling, rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, Michael Rapkine , Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten LLP & Yaw-Jiun Wu , Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP.
Wachovia Mortgage, Defendant, represented by Yaw-Jiun Wu , Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP & Frederick James Hickman , Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten LLP.
World Savings, Defendant, represented by Yaw-Jiun Wu , Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP & Frederick James Hickman , Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten LLP.
Golden W Sav. Assoc. Services Co., Defendant, represented by Frederick James Hickman , Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten LLP, Grace B Kang , Anglin, Flewelling, rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, Michael Rapkine , Anglin Flewelling Rasmussen Campbell & Trytten LLP & Yaw-Jiun Wu , Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP.
LSI Title Company, Defendant, represented by Masumi Jagdish Patel , Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss LLP & Edward A. Treder , Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP.
United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division.
ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
The parties are presently before the Court on an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why the instant action should not be remanded to the Alameda County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having read and considered the papers submitted, and being fully informed, the Court concludes that there is no diversity jurisdiction, and therefore, remand is appropriate.
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
