1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 724 F.Supp.2d
  5. 724 F.Supp.2d 286 (2010)
 

CURRIN v. ARISTA RECORDS, INC.

Case No. 3:07-CV-1069 (RNC).

724 F.Supp.2d 286 (2010)

Peter CURRIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARISTA RECORDS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 15, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Currin , Bloomfield, CT, pro se.

David Currin , Bloomfield, CT, pro se.

Joseph M. Gillis , Michael Menapace , Timothy Andrew Diemand, Wiggin & Dana, Hartford, CT, for Defendants.

RULING AND ORDER

ROBERT N. CHATIGNY, District Judge.

The Magistrate Judge's recommended ruling of February 25, 2010 (Doc. 187), recommends that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted on the plaintiffs' claims of copyright infringement on the ground that no reasonable trier could find that the two songs at issue are substantially similar. Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, have filed written objections to the recommended ruling (Doc. 196...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases