1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 849 F.3d
  5. 849 F.3d 780 (2017)
 

NASH v. OPTOMEC, INC.

No. 16-2186.

849 F.3d 780 (2017)

Thomas NASH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. OPTOMEC, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: March 1, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant and appeared on the brief was Stephen Charles Fiebiger , of Burnsville, MN.

Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Andrew E Tanick , of Minneapolis, MN. The following attorney also appeared on the appellee brief; David P. McKinney , of Minneapolis, MN.

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, LOKEN and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Nash filed suit against Optomec, Inc., alleging the company fired him on account of his age in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. §§ 363A.01, et seq. The district court1 granted Optomec's motion for summary judgment, finding Nash...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases