IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No. 14-15000.

846 F.3d 313 (2017)

IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Robert Pepper; Stephen H. Schwartz; Edward W. Hayter; Eric Terrell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Apple Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 12, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Rifkin (argued), Alexander H. Schmidt , and Michael Liskow , Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York; Francis M. Gregorek and Rachele R. Rickert , Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Daniel M. Wall (argued), Christopher S. Yates , and Sadik Huseny , Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, California; J. Scott Ballenger , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C.; for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: A. Wallace Tashima and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges, and Robert W. Gettleman, District Judge.


OPINION

In their current complaint, Plaintiffs allege that they purchased iPhones and iPhone applications ("apps") between 2007 and 2013, and that Apple has monopolized and attempted to monopolize the market for iPhone apps. In ruling on Apple's fourth motion to dismiss, the district court held that Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases