1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 838 F.3d
  5. 838 F.3d 1283 (2016)
 

DRONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. PARROT S.A.

2015-1892, 2015-1955.

838 F.3d 1283 (2016)

DRONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. PARROT S.A., Parrot, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 29, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GENE A. TABACHNICK , Beck & Thomas, P.C., Pittsburgh, PA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD T. TING.

JEFFREY A. LAMKEN , MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by SARAH JUSTINE NEWMAN , ERIC RICHARD NITZ ; JAMES E. HOPENFELD , Singer Bea LLP, San Francisco, CA; TAMMY J. TERRY , Osha Liang LLP, Houston, TX; JOHN M. WHEALAN , Chevy Chase, MD.

Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

Parrot, S.A. and Parrot, Inc. (collectively, "Parrot") appeal from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania that awarded Drone Technologies, Inc. ("Drone") damages for Parrot's infringement of two patents owned by Drone as assignee and that also awarded Drone attorney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases