INTERTAINER, INC. v. HULU, LLC

No. 2015-2065.

INTERTAINER, INC., Appellant v. HULU, LLC, Appellee

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 26, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DIRK D. THOMAS , McKool Smith, P.C., Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOEL LANCE THOLLANDER , Austin, TX.

ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS , Baker Botts LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HARPER BATTS .

Before PROST, Chief Judge, CHEN and STOLL, Circuit Judges.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Intertainer, Inc. ("Intertainer") appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("Board") Final Written Decision in a covered business method ("CBM") review finding that U.S. Patent No. 8,479,246 ("'246 patent") is anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102. For the reasons stated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases