Abdul Kadir MOHAMED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Rasier, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, and
Hirease, LLC, Defendant.
Ronald Gillette, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Uber Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.
Abdul Kadir Mohamed, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier, LLC, Defendants, and
Hirease, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted June 16, 2016, San Francisco, California.
Matthew C. Koski , National Employment Lawyers Association, Oakland, California; David H. Seligman , Towards Justice, Denver, Colorado; Jahan C. Sagafi , Outten & Golden LLP, San Francisco, California; for Amici Curiae National Employment Law Project, National Employment Lawyers Association, National Association of Consumer Advocates, and Towards Justice.
Before: Richard C. Tallman, Richard R. Clifton, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellees Abdul Mohamed and Ronald Gillette, former Uber drivers, filed an action in district court alleging on behalf of themselves and a proposed class of other drivers that Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Hirease, LLC, violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and various...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.