U.S. v. ROMERO

No. 15-30023.

833 F.3d 1151 (2016)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carl ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 15, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Broberg, II (argued), Law Office of William Broberg, Seattle, Washington, for Defendant-Appellant.

Teal Luthy Miller (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Annette L. Hayes , United States Attorney; Office of the United States Attorney, Seattle, Washington; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Susan P. Graber, Marsha S. Berzon, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Appellant Carl Romero challenges his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) on the ground that it violated the Speedy Trial Act. He contends that the district court improperly excluded 81 days that he maintains amounted to an "unreasonable" delay...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases