POLAR ELECTRO OY v. SUUNTO OY

2015-1930.

829 F.3d 1343 (2016)

POLAR ELECTRO OY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. SUUNTO OY, Defendant-Appellee. Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor, DBA Suunto USA, Firstbeat Technologies Oy, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: July 20, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JOHN P. MORAN , Holland & Knight, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANTHONY J. FUGA , Chicago, IL.

JEFFERY A. KEY , Key & Associates, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.


Polar Electro Oy ("Polar") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware granting Suunto Oy's ("Suunto") motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Polar Electro Oy v. Suunto Oy, No. 11-1100, 2015 WL 2248439 (D. Del. May 12,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases