AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. HARMONIC, INC.

No. 2015-1246.

812 F.3d 1040 (2016)

AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. HARMONIC, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 29, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. Castanias , Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by David B. Cochran , Joseph M. Sauer , Cleveland, OH; Joshua R. Nightingale , Pittsburgh, PA.

Boris Feldman , Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by James C. Yoon ; Robin L. Brewer , San Francisco, CA; Gideon A. Schor , New York, NY.

Before REYNA, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.


The jury in this case found that Harmonic, Inc. did not infringe two patents asserted by Avid Technology, Inc. On one of two claim elements that were the focus of the dispute at trial, the district court gave the jury a narrow construction based on what the court determined to be a prosecution disclaimer. We hold that construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases