1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 791 F.3d
  5. 791 F.3d 1041 (2015)
 

WARD v. APPLE INC.

No. 12-17805.

791 F.3d 1041 (2015)

Zack WARD; Thomas Buchar, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed June 29, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Rifkin (argued), Alexander H. Schmidt , and Michael Liskow , Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York; Francis M. Gregorek and Rachele R. Rickert , Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, San Diego, CA; Randall S. Newman , Randall S. Newman P.C., New York, N.Y., for Plaintiff-Appellant Zack Ward.

Adam J. Levitt , Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Buchar.

Daniel M. Wall (argued) and Christopher S. Yates , Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, CA; J. Scott Ballenger and Roman Martinez , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C., for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Dissent by Judge WALLACE.

OPINION

Zack Ward and Thomas Buchar (Plaintiffs) filed a putative class action against Apple Inc. (Apple), alleging that Apple conspired with AT & T Mobility (ATTM) to violate federal antitrust laws. The Plaintiffs' claims relate to Apple's exclusivity agreement with ATTM that ATTM would be the exclusive provider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases