1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KOBEL v. LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
 

KOBEL v. LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

No. 14-3042.

SCOTT HARRIS KOBEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; FNU LNU (1), Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility; FNU LNU (2), Deputy Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility; FNU LNU (3), Administrators, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) NANCE, Custody Staff Housing C1, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) REECE, Custody Staff Housing C1, Lansing Correctional Facility; FNU LNU (4), Any/All Unit Team Staff from February 2013 to May 2013, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) MOORE, S.O.R.T., Lansing Correctional Facility; FNU LNU (5), All A1 Staff, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) LONG, Lansing Correctional Facility; FNU LNU (6), A1 Unit Team Staff, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) ZAMORA, Correctional Officer I, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) BEYEN, Correctional Officer I, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) HEAD, Correctional Officer I, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) LEE, Correctional Officer I, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) GUNTHRIE, Correctional Officer I, Lansing Correctional Facility; FNU LNU (7), All A1 Custody Staff from March 27 to April 9, 2013, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) LORD, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) YOUNG, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) HARTLEY, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) ZEMA, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) ELLIOTT, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) MUCKENTHALER, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) HOLTHAUS, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) BASKAS, Correctional Officer, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) GRAHAM, Lansing Correctional Facility; (FNU) PAYNE, Lansing Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

August 28, 2014.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

NEIL M. GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Scott Kobel filed a pro se complaint against various Kansas prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As required by statute, the district court screened Mr. Kobel's complaint to determine whether he stated a non-frivolous basis for legal relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), (b); see also Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 213-16 (2007). Finding none, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases