1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 758 F.3d
  5. 758 F.3d 1362 (2014)
 

GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. APPLE INC.

No. 2013-1496.

758 F.3d 1362 (2014)

GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APPLE INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Motorola Mobility, LLC, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 14, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Giarratana , McCarter & English, LLP, of Hartford, CT, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Eric E. Grondahl ; Michael P. Kelly and Daniel M. Silver , of Wilmington, DE; and Stephen A. Saltzburg , George Washington University, School of Law, of Washington, DC.

Timothy S. Teter , Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Benjamin G. Damstedt , Lori R. Mason , and Lowell D. Mead.

Before MOORE, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. (GBT) appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment that Apple Inc. (Apple) does not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,574,267 (the '267 patent) and 7,359,427 (the '427 patent). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

GBT accused Apple of infringing the patents-in-suit,1 which describe and claim an improvement to a Code Division Multiple Access ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases