1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 637 F.3d
  5. 637 F.3d 721 (2011)
 

CE DESIGN LTD. v. KING ARCHITECTURAL METALS, INC.

No. 10-8050.

637 F.3d 721 (2011)

CE DESIGN LIMITED, on its own behalf and that of a class, Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellee, v. KING ARCHITECTURAL METALS, INC., Defendant-Petitioner-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 18, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony J. Anscombe , Attorney, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Petitioner-Appellant.

James M. Smith , Attorney, Bock & Hatch, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellee.

Before POSNER, MANION, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

We have decided to grant the defendant's petition to be allowed to appeal from the district judge's certification of a class, in this suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (as amended by the Junk Fax Prevention Act of 2005), 47 U.S.C. § 227. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(f). The petition presents a sufficiently novel and important issue concerning class action practice to justify our allowing the appeal. And because the petition and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases