TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 v. ASTRAZENECA PHARM.

No. 415, 2015.

136 A.3d 688 (2016)

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE FUND; Local 237 Teamsters Retirees' Benefit Fund; Local 237 Teamsters-Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Local 237 Teamsters-North Babylon School District Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Local 237 Teamsters-Brentwood School District Health and Welfare Trust Fund; and Local 237 Teamsters-Suffolk Regional Off-Track Betting Corporation Health and Welfare Trust Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP; and Zeneca, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: April 12, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Uriel Rabinovitz, Esquire (argued), Barbara J. Hart, Esquire , Scott V. Papp, Esquire , Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart, P.C., White Plains, New York, Pamela S. Tikellis, Esquire , A. Zachary Naylor, Esquire , Tiffany J. Cramer, Esquire , Chimicles & Tikellis LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Ellen Meriwether, Esquire , Bryan L. Clobes, Esquire , Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, L. Kendall Satterfield, Esquire , Finkelstein Thompson LLP, Washington, D.C., Robert S. Schachter, Esquire , Dan Drachler, Esquire , Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling, LLP, New York, New York, Jeffrey L. Kodroff, Esquire , Spector Roseman Kodroff & Willis, PC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Plaintiffs Below, Appellants Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund.

Michael P. Kelly, Esquire (argued), Daniel M. Silver, Esquire , McCarter & English LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Jack B. Jacobs, Esquire , Sidley Austin LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Mark E. Haddad, Esquire , Joshua E. Anderson, Esquire , David R. Carpenter, Esquire , Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants Below, Appellees AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and Zeneca, Inc.

Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and SEITZ, Justices.


I. INTRODUCTION

A group of New York-based third party payor health insurers ("TPPs") that provide prescription drug benefits to union members appeal from a Superior Court judgment dismissing with prejudice their second amended complaint. At issue are claims brought by the TPPs under various state consumer fraud laws against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases