PURTILL v. WEITL

No. A147793.

MICHAEL PURTILL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PATRICIA WEITL, as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 12, 2017.

June 16, 2017.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.115

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 25, 2017, be modified as follows:

The final two sentences of the penultimate paragraph, on page 20, are deleted and replaced with the following:

"The schedules reflected assets of $3,355,057, primarily real property, and liabilities of $1,884,757, and the record indicates without contradiction that at the time of trial Pippo remained the owner of this substantial acreage. There is no evidence that Pippo's financial condition changed materially after the schedules were prepared."

The petition for rehearing is denied. There is no change in the judgment.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases