FLOWERS v. PRASAD

No. B260140.

238 Cal.App.4th 930 (2015)

190 Cal.Rptr.3d 33

SETH FLOWERS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BRINDA PRASAD et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

July 17, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Litigation & Advocacy Group and Glenn A. Murphy for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James S. Link for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

In the underlying action for disability discrimination, appellants John and Seth Flowers alleged that they were denied service at respondents' restaurant due to John Flowers's service dog. In sustaining a demurrer and granting summary adjudication in respondents' favor, the trial court concluded that appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases