1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 539 F.3d
  5. 539 F.3d 218 (2008)
 

ROSENAU v. UNIFUND CORP.

No. 07-3019.

539 F.3d 218 (2008)

Richard ROSENAU, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. UNIFUND CORP. a/k/a Unifund Group Corp.; Unifund CCR Partners. Richard Rosenau, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed: August 20, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cary L. Flitter (Argued), Lundy, Flitter, Beldecos & Berger, Narberth, PA, for Appellant.

Richard J. Perr (Argued), Fineman, Krekstein & Harris, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.

Before: RENDELL, SMITH and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Richard Rosenau claims that a debt-collection letter he received from Unifund Corporation and/or Unifund CCR Partners ("Unifund") was deceptive under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. The District Court granted Unifund's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Rosenau appeals, arguing that the letter was deceptive because (1) it implied that it came from an attorney and (2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases