1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 944 A.2d
  5. 944 A.2d 713 (2008)
 

NAIK v. NAIK

944 A.2d 713 (2008)

399 N.J. Super. 390

Sumeru NAIK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Urvi NAIK, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 14, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Urvi Naik, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Michael E. Spinato argued the cause for respondent (Spinato, November, Conte & Acquaviva, attorneys; Mr. Spinato, of counsel; Robert J. Kane, on the brief).

Before Judges A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, C.S. FISHER and C.L. MINIMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, P.J.A.D.

In this divorce appeal, we address the enforceability and amount of support that must be paid by the signer of an immigration Affidavit of Support (Form I-864EZ), pursuant to § 213A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1183a. This form creates a binding contract that imposes an obligation on the sponsor of a sponsored immigrant to insure that the immigrant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases