ROQUET v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Nos. 04-1616, 04-1838.

398 F.3d 585 (2005)

Nancy J. ROQUET and Coretta Robinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided February 9, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Edelman, argued, Edelman, Combs & Latturner, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

John A. McDonald, argued, Quarles & Brady, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before RIPPLE, WOOD, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This case involves the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109, better known by its shortened name, the WARN Act. The Act became law in 1989, and its purpose is to soften the economic blow suffered by workers who unexpectedly face plant closings or mass layoffs. Among other things, the Act requires that companies subject to its reach (generally large employers) give employees 60 days notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases