1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 309 F.Supp.2d
  5. 309 F.Supp.2d 395 (2004)
 

SCOTT v. DIXON

No. CV 02-4654.

309 F.Supp.2d 395 (2004)

Linda SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. Peter DIXON and Candida Dixon Defendants

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

March 19, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Flower, Medalie & Markowitz, Esqs. by Donald Markowitz, Esq., Bay Shore, NY, for Plaintiff.

Wormser, Kiely, Galef & Jacobs LLP by Jennifer L. Marlborough, Esq. John T. Morin, Esq., New York City, for Defendants.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

WEXLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Linda Scott ("Plaintiff" or "Scott") commenced this action in her capacity as the author of a work of visual art, pursuant to the Visual Artists Rights Act, 17 U.S.C. § 106 (the "VARA"). Scott seeks damages on the theory that Defendants Peter and Candida Dixon ("Defendants" or the "Dixons") destroyed Scott's work of art, in violation of Plaintiff's rights under VARA.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases