SOUTH DAKOTA FARM BUREAU INC. v. HAZELTINE

Nos. 02-2366, 02-2588, 02-2644, 02-2646.

340 F.3d 583 (2003)

SOUTH DAKOTA FARM BUREAU, INC.; South Dakota Sheep Growers Association, Inc.; Haverhals Feedlot, Inc.; Sjovall Feedyard, Inc.; Frank D. Brost; Donald Tesch; William A. Aeschlimann; Spear H. Ranch, Inc.; Marston Holben; Marston and Marian Holben Family Trust; Montana-Dakota Utilities Company; Northwestern Public Service; Otter Tail Power Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Joyce HAZELTINE, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of South Dakota; Mark W. Barnett, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Dakota, Defendants-Appellants, Dakota Rural Action; South Dakota Resources Coalition, Intervenors Defendants, State of Nebraska; Everett Holstein; Rudy Meduna; Dan Hodges, Amicus on Behalf of Appellants, The American Farm Bureau Federation; Alabama Farm Bureau Federation; Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation; Kansas Farm Bureau Federation; Kentucky Farm Bureau Federation; Minnesota Farm Bureau Federation; North Dakota Farm Bureau Federation; Utah Farm Bureau Federation, Amicus on Behalf of Appellees. South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc.; South Dakota Sheep Growers Association, Inc.; Haverhals Feedlot, Inc.; Sjovall Feedyard, Inc.; Frank D. Brost; Donald Tesch; William A. Aeschlimann; Spear H. Ranch, Inc.; Marston Holben; Marston and Marian Holben Family Trust; Montana-Dakota Utilities Company; Northwestern Public Service; Otter Tail Power Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Joyce Hazeltine, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of South Dakota; Mark W. Barnett, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Dakota, Defendants, Dakota Rural Action; South Dakota Resources Coalition, Intervenors Defendants-Appellants, Everett Holstein; Rudy Meduna; Dan Hodges, Amicus on Behalf of Appellants. South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc.; South Dakota Sheep Growers Association, Inc.; Haverhals Feedlot, Inc.; Sjovall Feedyard, Inc.; Frank D. Brost; Donald Tesch; William A. Aeschlimann, Plaintiffs, Spear H. Ranch, Inc.; Marston Holben; Marston and Marian Holben Family Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Montana-Dakota Utilities Company; Northwestern Public Service; Otter Tail Power Company, Plaintiffs, v. Joyce Hazeltine, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of South Dakota; Mark W. Barnett, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Dakota, Defendants-Appellees, Dakota Rural Action; South Dakota Resources Coalition, Intervenors Defendants-Appellees. South Dakota Farm Bureau, Inc.; South Dakota Sheep Growers Association, Inc.; Haverhals Feedlot, Inc.; Sjovall Feedyard, Inc.; Frank D. Brost; Donald Tesch; William A. Aeschlimann, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Spear H. Ranch, Inc.; Marston Holben; Marston and Marian Holben Family Trust; Montana-Dakota Utilities Company; Northwestern Public Service; Otter Tail Power Company, Plaintiffs, v. Joyce Hazeltine, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of South Dakota; Mark W. Barnett, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Dakota, Defendants-Appellees, Dakota Rural Action; South Dakota Resources Coalition, Intervenors Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: August 19, 2003.

Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and for Rehearing October 31, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane M. Best, argued, Pierre, SD (Roxanne Giedd, on the brief), for appellants Barnett and Hazeltine in 02-2366, 02-2644 and 02-2646.

Randy C. Canney, argued, Denver, CO, for intervenors South Dakota Resources and Dakota Rural Action in all cases.

David S. Day, argued, Vermillion, SD (Richard O. Gregerson, on the brief), for appellees Aeschlimann, Tesch, Brost, Sjovall Feedyard, Haverhals Feedlot, South Dakota Sheep Growers and South Dakota Farm Bureau in all cases.

David A. Gerdes, argued, Pierre, SD (Neil Fulton, on the brief), for appellees Otter Tail Power Co., Northwestern Public Service and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. in all cases.

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.


Order Denying Petition for Rehearing and for Rehearing En Banc October 31, 2003.

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.

The South Dakota Constitution prohibits corporations and syndicates, subject to certain exemptions, from acquiring or obtaining an interest in land used for farming and from otherwise engaging in farming in South Dakota. This restriction, known as Amendment E, was added to the South Dakota Constitution as the result of a 1998 referendum. The thirteen Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases