1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 72 P.3d
  5. 72 P.3d 220 (2003)
 

HEAPHY v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 28345-0-II.

72 P.3d 220 (2003)

117 Wash.App. 438

Denise HEAPHY and Michael Chad Knesek, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

July 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard J. Feldman, Kenneth E. Payson, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, Seattle, for Appellant.

Stephen Michael Hansen, Tacoma, Debra Brewer Hayes, Reich & Binstock, Houston, for Respondent.

ARMSTRONG, J.

State Farm and Denise Heaphy could not resolve their dispute over whether State Farm had fully compensated Heaphy under her underinsured motorists (UIM) coverage for her property damage. In addition to her repair bill, Heaphy claimed a loss for the diminished value of the vehicle. Conceding that diminished value is covered under Heaphy's policy, State Farm sought arbitration. The trial court found that the dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases