VAN ZANTEN v. VAN ZANTEN

0101-01108; A116210.

78 P.3d 100 (2003)

190 Or. App. 73

M. Rodger VAN ZANTEN, Appellant, v. Dyrk VAN ZANTEN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 15, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David R. Nepom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

R. Daniel Lindahl, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Bullivant Houser Bailey, P.C.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action for personal injuries that he sustained when defendant's dog ran into him and knocked him to the ground. The trial court granted defendant's motion to dismiss because it concluded that plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case. ORCP 54 B(2). We review for errors of law and reverse.

We state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the nonmoving party. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases