JACKSON COUNTY v. WEHREN

00-01180 and 99-01486; A114211.

63 P.3d 1233 (2003)

186 Or. App. 555

In the Matter of the Compensation of Christopher J. Wehren, Claimant. JACKSON COUNTY, Petitioner, v. Christopher J. WEHREN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 19, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Goodman, McMinnville, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the opening brief were James W. Moller and Cummins, Goodman, Fish, Denley & Vickers, P.C. With him on the reply brief was James W. Moller.

Robert F. Webber, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Black, Chapman, Webber, Stevens & Petersen.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and KISTLER and SCHUMAN, Judges.


SCHUMAN, J.

Faced with conflicting medical opinions as to whether claimant's recurrent neck and shoulder pain resulted in major part from an earlier compensable injury, the Workers' Compensation Board (board) accepted the opinion that it did. On judicial review, employer argues that the accepted opinion was not based on a sufficiently complete medical history and that it did not adequately evaluate the relative contribution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases