1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 256 F.Supp.2d
  5. 256 F.Supp.2d 1009 (2003)
 

TORO CO. v. SCAG POWDER EQUIPMENT, INC.

No. 8:01CV279.

256 F.Supp.2d 1009 (2003)

THE TORO COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, and Exmark Mfg. Co, a Nebraska Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. SCAG POWER EQUIPMENT, INC, a Wisconsin Corporation, and Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska.

January 27, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toni L. Bonney, Michael E. Husmann, Richard H. Marshall, Best & Friedrich LAw, Milwaukee, WI, David L. DeBruin, Jonathan H. Margolies, Michael, Best Law Firm, Shane M. Niebergall, Dennis L. Thomte, Thomte, Mazour Law Firm, Omaha, NE, Richard P. Jeffries, Kutak Rock, LLP, Omaha, NE, for Defendants.

Jeffrey C. Brown, Alan W. Kowalchyk, Earl D. Reiland, Mark D. Schuman, Merchant, Gould Law Firm, Minneapolis, MN, for Plaintiffs.

Donald S. Trevarthen, Bloomington, MN, for Toro Company.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BATAILLON, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Scag and Metalcraft ("the defendants") move for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,845,475 (" ` 475"). Filing No. 105. Exmark and Toro ("the plaintiffs") oppose the motion. The parties have filed briefs and indexes of evidence.1 Having carefully considered the parties' filings and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases