1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 278 F.3d
  5. 278 F.3d 672 (2002)
 

U.S. v. VERA

No. 01-1616.

278 F.3d 672 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David VERA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Valerie Hays (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Crim. Div., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David S. Mejia (argued), Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and WOOD, JR., and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Only one issue in this criminal appeal justifies treatment in a published opinion: Whether the holding of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), requires matters relevant to criminal forfeiture to be established beyond a reasonable doubt. Like the other circuits that have considered this question, we hold that Apprendi does not disturb the rule that forfeiture...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases