1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 147 F.Supp.2d
  5. 147 F.Supp.2d 556 (2001)
 

ANDERSON v. PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORP.

No. 9:98-CV-7.

147 F.Supp.2d 556 (2001)

Octavius ANDERSON, et al, Plaintiffs, v. PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORP. Defendant,

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division.

April 9, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip R. Russ, George E. Chandler, Chandler Law Officer, Amarillo, TX, Lufkin, for plaintiff.

Edward L. Kemble, Estil A. Vance, Kevin C. Norton, Cantey & Hanger, Fort Worth, Curtis William Fenley, III, Fenley & Bate, Lufkin, TX, for defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

HANNAH, District Judge.

Came on this day consideration of the bench trial conducted before this Court during the first full week of March, 2001. Having considered the evidence submitted, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any finding of fact more properly characterized as a conclusion of law should be construed as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases