RHINE v. CASIO, INC.

No. 396CV7524.

163 F.Supp.2d 839 (2001)

Gary E. RHINE, Plaintiff v. CASIO, INC., et al, Defendants

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division.

August 13, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Porcello, Jr., Mark C. Schaffer, Emch, Schaffer, Schaub & Porcello, Toledo, OH, for Gary E. Rhine.

Barry D. Rein, Pennis & Edmonds, New York City, Daniel J. McMullen, Calfee, Halter & Griswold, Cleveland, OH, Kenneth L. Stein, for Casio Computer Co., Ltd.


ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

This is a patent case in which the Federal Circuit has ordered an examination into the validity of the plaintiff's patent. Following that court's decision, the defendant elected to submit the patent to an ex parte examination.

Pending is a demand by the defendant for an order granting it the right to attend and record all interviews with the examiner relating to the patent in suit. According to the defendant, the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases