1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 140 F.3d
  5. 140 F.3d 442 (1998)
 

ITAR-TASS RUSSIAN NEWS AGENCY v. RUSSIAN KURIER

Docket No. 97-7444.

140 F.3d 442 (1998)

ITAR-TASS RUSSIAN NEWS AGENCY et al., Plaintiff, v. RUSSIAN KURIER, INC. et al., Defendant. Al J. DANIEL, Jr. and Michael Newcity, Appellants, v. ITAR-TASS RUSSIAN NEWS AGENCY, et al., and Julian H. Lowenfeld and Moskovsky Komsomolets and AR Publishing Co. Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided April 3, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Al J. Daniel, Jr., New York City, pro se.

Michael Newcity, Durham, NC, pro se.

Julian H. Lowenfeld, New York City, pro se and for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

William J.T. Brown, New York City (Donovan Leisure Newton & Irvine), for Plaintiffs-Appellees Moskovsky Komsomolets and AR Publishing Co., Inc.

Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, MESKILL, Circuit Judge, and POLLACK, District Judge.

POLLACK, Senior District Judge:

PRELIMINARY

This Circuit's opinion is that the district court has a "responsibility to protect its own officers in such matters as fee disputes." Cluett, Peabody & Co. v. CPC Acquisition Co., 863 F.2d 251, 256 (2d Cir.1988).

BACKGROUND

During the final phases of a non-jury copyright litigation, after the case was tried but while it was sub judice, appellant Al...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases