1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 117 F.3d
  5. 117 F.3d 50 (1997)
 

CLOROX CO. v. STERLING WINTHROP, INC.

No. 1041, Docket 96-9030.

117 F.3d 50 (1997)

The CLOROX COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. STERLING WINTHROP, INC.; Reckitt & Colman, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided June 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kim J. Landsman, New York City (Robert W. Lehrburger, Carin G. Reynolds, Judith Jobin, Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler LLP, New York City, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant.

Paul C. Curnin, New York City (Eleanor M. Fox, Lawrence M. Young, Pieter Van Tol, Jennifer A. Hand, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: WALKER, PARKER and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

PARKER, Circuit Judge:

The Clorox Company ("Clorox") appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Manuel Real, J.) granting summary judgment to Sterling Winthrop, Inc. ("Sterling") and Reckitt & Colman, Inc. ("Reckitt") on Clorox's antitrust claims under Sections One and Two of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. Clorox, which recently acquired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases