STIRLEN v. SUPERCUTS, INC.

Docket No. A070573.

51 Cal.App.4th 1519 (1997)

WILLIAM N. STIRLEN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SUPERCUTS, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

January 9, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel J. Herling for Defendants and Appellants.

Kathleen M. Lucas and David S. Schwartz for Plaintiff and Respondent.


OPINION

KLINE, P.J.

The San Francisco Superior Court refused to enforce a compulsory arbitration clause of an employment contract on the grounds it was against public policy and unconscionable. We find this determination correct and hold that, in the circumstances of this case, the governing state law pertaining to unconscionable contracts (Civ. Code, § 1670.5) is not preempted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases