MULLER v. BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA) INC.

No. S-7128.

923 P.2d 783 (1996)

Bambi (Relkin) MULLER and Lowell Relkin, Plaintiffs, v. BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA) INC., Defendant.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

September 13, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Relkin, Albuquerque, New Mexico, pro se.

Ben J. Esch, Garretson & Esch, Anchorage, for Plaintiffs.

Katherine C. Tank, Perkins Coie, Anchorage, for Defendant.

Before COMPTON, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, and EASTAUGH, JJ., and CARPENETI, J. Pro Tem.


OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We here consider the effect of the marital status anti-discrimination clause in AS 18.80.220(a)(1). After an unmarried couple sued their former employer, the United States District Court for the District of Alaska certified to us the following two questions: whether AS 18.80.220(a)(1) prevents an employer from discriminating against an employee "based on the identity of his spouse," and whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases