1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 889 F.Supp.
  5. 889 F.Supp. 68 (1995)
 

AARISMAA v. MAYE

No. 94-CV-1550.

889 F.Supp. 68 (1995)

Jaan AARISMAA, IV, Plaintiff, v. Dr. John E. MAYE, James H. Fertig, Esq. Daniel K. Tennant, Lawrence Philp, Hon. W. Howard Sullivan, City of Norwich, NY, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

June 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jaan Aarismaa, IV, plaintiff, pro se.

James H. Fertig, defendant, pro se.

Coughlin & Gerhart (Paul J. Sweeney, of counsel), Binghamton, NY, for defendants Maye and Tennant.

Dennis Vacco, New York State Atty. Gen. (Earl F. Gialanella, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), Albany, NY, for defendant Sullivan.

Hartjen & Hudanich (Lee C. Hartjen, of counsel), Johnson City, NY, for defendant City of Norwich.

MEMORANDUM, DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

At oral argument on April 28, 1995, the court granted defendants' motions to dismiss the action based on the court's lack of jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. These motions were brought by defendants Sullivan, Maye, Tennant and Fertig. Accordingly, the court also denied plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment. This oral decision was summarized in an order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases