1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 278 N.J.
  5. 278 N.J. Super. 521 (1995)
 

DINTER v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

278 N.J. Super. 521 (1995)

651 A.2d 1033

RIKI DINTER AND ELLIOTT DINTER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, DEFENDANT, AND BERTRAM SIEGEL, AND SIEGEL & SIEGEL, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 10, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bennett J. Wasserman argued the cause for appellants.

Bertram Siegel argued the cause for respondents Bertram Siegel and Siegel & Siegel (Bertram Siegel, of counsel; Todd Siegel, on the brief).

Frank P. Addas appeared on behalf of defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company (Addas & Potenza, attorneys; Mr. Addas, on the briefs).

Before Judges PETRELLA, HAVEY and BROCHIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

On this appeal we decide what is in essence a fee dispute between successive trial attorneys, arising from an order of the trial court allocating fees following disposition of a negligence case. After a no cause of action in the first trial, and a reversal and remand following an appeal, the second trial attorney settled the underlying negligence action. The trial judge, over objection, awarded intervenor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases