1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 659 A.2d
  5. 659 A.2d 868 (1995)
 

DEVINE v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES

659 A.2d 868 (1995)

Thomas DEVINE v. ROCHE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORIES, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided June 15, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Furbish (orally), Smith Elliott Smith & Garmey, P.A., Portland, for plaintiff.

Gerald P. Petruccelli (orally), James B. Haddow, Petruccelli & Martin, Portland, for Northern Diagnostic Lab.

Malcolm L. Lyons (orally), Benjamin Townsend, Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Augusta, for Roche Biomedical.

Constance P. O'Neil, Conley, Haley & O'Neil, Bath, for B.I.W.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA and LIPEZ, JJ.

RUDMAN, Justice.

Thomas Devine appeals from summary judgments entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brodrick, J.) in favor of Northern Diagnostic Laboratories (NorDx) and Roche Biomedical Laboratories on Devine's third party beneficiary claim. Devine claims intended third party beneficiary status with respect to a contract for drug testing confirmation services between Bath Iron Works (BIW) and NorDx. NorDx provided courier service to Roche, with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases