1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 179 Ariz.
  5. 179 Ariz. 359 (1994)
 

MERVYN'S v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARICOPA

Nos. 1 CA-SA 94-0081, 1 CA-SA 94-0082 and 1 CA-SA 94-0083.

179 Ariz. 359 (1994)

879 P.2d 367

MERVYN'S, a California corporation, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, The Honorable C. Kimball Rose, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; and the Department of Revenue of the State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest. PIMA GRANDE DEVELOPMENT, an Arizona general partnership, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, The Honorable C. Kimball Rose, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; and the Department of Revenue of the State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest. DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Target, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, The Honorable C. Kimball Rose, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, MARICOPA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; and the Department of Revenue of the State of Arizona, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1.

August 16, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Manoil, Phoenix, and Flanagan, Bilton & Brannigan by Dean H. Bilton, Chicago, IL, co-counsel, for petitioners Mervyn's, Pima Grande and Dayton Hudson.

Helm & Kyle, Ltd. by John D. Helm, Roberta S. Livesay, Ileen K. Keenan, James C. Carty, Tempe, for real parties in interest Maricopa County.

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

These three special actions were filed and considered by this court on the same date. On April 18, 1994, we issued an order accepting jurisdiction of the special actions and denying relief. The order stated that an opinion would be issued in due course. This is that opinion.

In these special actions we are asked to decide a question of first impression: whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases