McGEE v. McGEE


277 N.J. Super. 1 (1994)

648 A.2d 1128

PAUL McGEE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CAROL McGEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 21, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia M. Barbarito argued the cause for appellant (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher & Barbarito, attorneys for appellant; Bonnie C. Frost, on the brief).

Peter J. Laemers argued the cause for respondent (Morris, Downing & Sherred, attorneys; Cynthia L. Gehring and Mr. Laemers, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL and LONG.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D.

Defendant Carol McGee challenges certain aspects of the final judgment of divorce which dissolved her marriage to plaintiff, Paul McGee. On appeal, Mrs. McGee argues that the trial judge erred in his award of equitable distribution by failing to consider the premarital history of the parties; improperly awarded her "rehabilitative alimony" when permanent alimony was warranted; and neglected to apply the proper...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases