O'DONOGHUE v. BEAR MOUNTAIN SKI RESORT

Docket No. E012438.

30 Cal.App.4th 188 (1994)

35 Cal. Rptr.2d 467

CONOR O'DONOGHUE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEAR MOUNTAIN SKI RESORT, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

November 3, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Joseph L. Dunn and Alan M. Jones for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, Paul S. Rosenlund and Peter J. Koenig for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

DABNEY Acting P.J.

Plaintiff Conor O'Donoghue appeals after the trial court granted summary judgment against him on his cause of action for personal injuries he suffered while skiing at Bear Mountain Ski Resort. The court granted summary judgment for defendant Bear Mountain on the basis of "primary assumption of the risk." (See Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases