Plaintiff Conor O'Donoghue appeals after the trial court granted summary judgment against him on his cause of action for personal injuries he suffered while skiing at Bear Mountain Ski Resort. The court granted summary judgment for defendant Bear Mountain on the basis of "primary assumption of the risk." (See Knight v. Jewett (1992)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
O'DONOGHUE v. BEAR MOUNTAIN SKI RESORT
30 Cal.App.4th 188 (1994)
35 Cal. Rptr.2d 467
CONOR O'DONOGHUE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEAR MOUNTAIN SKI RESORT, Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 3, 1994.
November 3, 1994.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Joseph L. Dunn and Alan M. Jones for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, Paul S. Rosenlund and Peter J. Koenig for Defendant and Respondent.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.