1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 884 P.2d
  5. 884 P.2d 868 (1994)
 

McKENZIE v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY

LUBA Nos. 93-205, 93-209; CA A85200.

884 P.2d 868 (1994)

131 Or. App. 177

Dan McKENZIE, Petitioner below, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent below. and Arnold Rochlin, Intervenor below. Arnold ROCHLIN, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Respondent, and Dan McKenzie, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. DuBay, Chief Asst. County Counsel, and Laurence Kressel, County Counsel, filed the brief for respondent Multnomah County.

Dan McKenzie filed the brief pro se.

Arnold Rochlin filed the briefs pro se.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RIGGS and HASELTON, JJ.

DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner Rochlin seeks review of and respondent McKenzie cross-petitions from LUBA's remand of Multnomah County's decisions granting design review approval of McKenzie's proposed nonforest dwelling and determining that his previously granted conditional use permit for the dwelling had not expired. We affirm on the petition without discussion. One of McKenzie's contentions in his cross-petition requires...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases