PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction for criminal mischief in the first degree. ORS 164.365. At trial, he objected to the imposition of restitution because the trial court failed to consider defendant's ability to pay and he assigns error to the sentence of restitution. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing restitution, because it failed to consider defendant's ability to pay. ORS 137.106(2)(b). Therefore, we remand...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.