1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 884 P.2d
  5. 884 P.2d 586 (1994)
 

THOMPSON v. DOCKSTADER

92-5-51; CA A79820.

884 P.2d 586 (1994)

131 Or. App. 254

Gisela THOMPSON, Appellant, v. Jeanette Lefley DOCKSTADER, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Uffelman, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Daniel M. Pope and Hansen & Uffelman.

James N. Westwood, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were John R. Bakkensen, Gregory A. Chaimov and Miller, Nash, Wiener, Hager & Carlsen.

Before DEITS, P.J., RIGGS, J., and BUTTLER, Senior Judge.

BUTTLER, Senior Judge.

In this action on a promissory note, the trial court, without a jury, entered findings of fact1 from which it concluded that the note was not enforceable, "because it was given without consideration." The action was then dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals, contending that no consideration was necessary, because the note was given "as security for an antecedent debt." Former ORS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases